Monthly Archives: April 2026
Ready or Not 2: Here I Come (2026)/ They Will Kill You (2026)
It’s not uncommon for Hollywood to have similar movies. It’s not even that uncommon for them to be released months apart, like the great 1998 dualities of Antz/A Bug’s Life and Deep Impact/Armageddon. However, I don’t know if I’ve ever witnessed two movies with such similar plots and tones being released on the exact same day. Well, if you’re a diehard fan of Satanic cults hunting down a rebellious sacrifice who is trying to save her sister amid locked-in locations and lots of explosions of ruby-red blood, then you’ll be in luck with a splatterific double-feature of Ready or Not 2 and They Will Kill You.
2019’s eat-the-rich predecessor, Ready or Not, was one of the best movies that year with one of the most joyously memorable endings. It didn’t need a sequel because it felt complete and satisfying. Even with the same returning directors and writers, it can’t help but feel like a contrived retread. Instead of one family hunting down a target over the course of one night now we have five families hunting down the same target over the course of a day. There are new rules like only one hunter from each family at a time, and they’re not allowed to kill the other hunters lest they and their entire bloodline explode as punishment. The extra rules and moving pieces cannot hide the fact that it feels more of the same. This time it’s not just Samara Weaving as our bloodied bride Grace but now Kathryn Newton as her reluctant and estranged sister, Faith. Their bickering dynamic never really evolves into something more interesting or genuine. It feels like the filmmakers roped the sister into the plot but then didn’t know what to do with her besides as someone Grace could talk to throughout the ordeal. I wish more was done to reveal their history than the old staples, “You were never there. You run when things get tough. You’re selfish.” The nature of the family-versus-family competition could have been sharply satirical in so many different aims, from intra-class warfare to generational relatability difficulties to even demented summer camps. I wanted to know how and why each family got into this pact with the Devil, but alas. Due to the rules, you know each family rep is only going to be onscreen for so long, which means we’re briskly running members of this cast into a meat grinder. It admittedly keeps things fresh but also means few if any of these supporting characters are going to leave an impression (beyond a stain on the wall). The best part of the sequel is Elijah Wood as a hilariously nonplussed keeper of the arcane bylaws and rules. Too often Ready or Not 2 feels like a less developed, less thoughtful, less entertaining knockoff of its original. If there is a Ready or Not 3, I hope it breaks free from the franchise constraints stifling its ongoing creative longevity.
The sensationally stylized and enormously entertaining They Will Kill You is certainly not subtle about its genre influences, from Rosemary’s Baby to Kill Bill and even Wes Anderson’s formalized dollhouse presentation. It’s about a co-op building filled with Satanists who make human sacrifices to their “boss,” and Zazie Beetz (Deadpool 2) just so happens to be a newly hired maid they’ve set their sights on. Too bad for them that this underestimated maid is a scrapper fresh out of prison. The first big fight sets the stage for the glorious entertainment that follows, with Beetz taking on a team of over-confident garbage bag-slicker-wearing cultists. The limbs go flying, the blood spurts in gallons, and the fight choreography is fun and demented even before a supernatural twist complicates later bouts. They Will Kill You doesn’t offer much on characterization or themes. Its story is spare. It doesn’t offer much on world-building (the building is designed so each floor caters to a different vice, though this gets unfortunately forgotten after the orgy floor). What the movie offers is copious bloodshed, inventive violence, and a celebration of carnage and spectacle. Its fiendish mayhem and superb choreography are the primary selling points, like the John Wick franchise. The results can be exhilarating when executed at such high levels of craft. There’s a standout sequence where Beetz is attacking multiple people in a dark dining room. She wields a flaming axe and every vicious strike ignites the victims, accumulating more light in the dim room. I was grinning and cackling so hard (then I unexpectedly teared up because I knew, deep in my soul, that my father would have loved this). Beetz is terrific as our ferocious fighting force, and the long takes and creative ingenuity allow us to appreciate her efforts even more. She deserves more action roles. I don’t know if the final boss is worth the buildup but it is different, and the climax follows the established rules in clever fashion. The un-reality of the movie, which often feels like a stage, becomes yet another charm in a movie that feels beholden to absurd style. It never takes itself too seriously and delivers the goods when it comes to fun, funny, ridiculous, and ridiculously cool action.
Grades:
Ready or Not 2: Here I Come: C+
They Will Kill You: B+
The Drama (2026)
A provocative cringe-comedy with some pointed questions about how well you can ever truly know a person, what we can forgive, and the challenges to confront our pasts. The Drama is about an engaged couple, Emma and Charles (Zendaya, Robert Pattinson), preparing for their big day. During a night of drinking with their maid of honor and best man, who happen to be married, the couples confess the worst thing they’ve ever done. Everyone is laughing until Emma reveals (I’m going to spoil her secret because: 1) it’s early in Act One of the film, 2) it’s essential to better understand the movie’s drama, 3) people deserve to know who otherwise would have no interest because of it) that as a teenage victim of bullying she had planned a mass shooting that she never went through with after a peer died in a different shooting. Charles is trying to square his view of Emma before and after this revelation, scrambling for context and rationalization while haunted by questions over whether these thoughts might resurface. I’m glad that writer/director Kristoffer Borgli (Dream Scenario) didn’t just assign Emma some feat of sexual exploration that made Charles feel emasculated and insecure. That would be too easy and expected. The mass shooting plot is so much more to reckon with, complicated by the fact that Emma declined to make it happen and even became a fierce advocate against gun violence, finding a community in her school that she lacked before. There’s not much in the way of larger commentary specifically relating to mass shootings or gun culture in America, which is a shame. Dream Scenario had some fantastic satire and commentary relating to celebrity, cancel culture, and ownership of identity. Most of The Drama is an awkward comedy of people trying to pretend everything is normal. It can make for great squirm-inducing giggles, like a couples photography session that never loosens up, or Charles trying to come up with analogies to explain his plight but having to keep adding additional context to get people to see things the way he wants. The end is a spectacular combination of misunderstandings and secrets coming to a head. Perhaps most surprising is that The Drama is measured not by human darkness and the capability of harm or self-delusion but in our capacity for hope and empathy. The concept of radical empathy is discussed, about accepting people for who they are and not who you wish they were, and Borgli challenges the viewer to reckon with our own judgements, biases, and limitations. Are we more than merely our worst moments? The Drama thinks so, and so do I.
Nate’s Grade: B+
The Bride! (2026)
Few movies leave you completely dumbfounded, trying to properly assess the miscalculated artistic choices and make sense of what you’ve just witnessed. The Bride! is one of those movies. I found myself asking, “What am I watching?” on more than five occasions. Ostensibly Maggie Gyllenhaal, serving as writer and director, was aiming to retell the Bride of Frankenstein (played by recent Oscar winner Jessie Buckley) as a feminist uprising set amidst a Bonnie and Clyde 1930s backdrop. That sounds like a workable idea, but then did you know that the literal ghost of Mary Shelley serves as our intrusive narrator because even after death she still had a few more things that she wanted to get off her dead chest? Did you know she’s also played by Buckely, so throughout the movie she’ll be talking like a 1930s Chicago dame and then, out of nowhere, she’s talking like a British aristocrat. This is because the literal ghost of Shelley is possessing this woman who looks exactly like her. Also, apparently, the characters Shelley created are… real in the same universe that she is? Did you know there’s a literal song-and-dance number to “Puttin’ on the Ritz” as a strange nod to Young Frankenstein? It’s not some imaginary diversion. It actually happens, I believe, thanks to that ghost of Shelley possessing a whole dance team. Did you know that The Bride inspires an armada of women to follow her supposed self-actualization to smear black crud on their face and rise up, becoming an avenging feminist force that appears to be about firing guns in the air and screaming about their ruined brains? The concept of reanimating The Bride with a healthy dose of feminist rage and re-framing her agency is a fitting vehicle to examine an overlooked perspective for a character better known for her silence and prominent hairdo. However, I don’t think this movie manages to make the character and her plight more universal. There are multiple incidents of sexual violence and predatory men, as well as Buckely screaming “Me too” in repeated emphasis during one scene. This is a big, broad, messy movie stitched together and careening through tone and genre homage. Buckley is unhinged and all over the place, fascinating you at one moment and making you cringe the next, especially when she alternates in and out of Shelley’s possession. There is a lot of style and intriguing ideas and commentary here just trying to find purchase amongst the overwhelming junk. This is an ambitious movie with some bold swings and the risk is that you may miss badly, and The Bride! is all misses.
Nate’s Grade: D
Dust Bunny (2025)
Bryan Fuller is one of those names in television that is spoken of like an institution, at least for geeks. The man is responsible for short-lived but beloved TV series like Dead Like Me, Wonderfalls, Pushing Daisies, Hannibal, and launching the new Star Trek Discovery universe as well as cracking the “un-adaptable” Neil Gaiman novel, American Gods, at least for its brilliant first season before he and co-creator Michael Green were jettisoned for cheaper alternatives. That’s the other thing about Bryan Fuller, he tends to wear out his welcome fast for such an eponymous show-starter. Whether it’s work habits or ego, or just butting heads with foolhardy execs, Fuller tends to get pushed out on his projects. That’s why a movie written and directed by Fuller has immediate and immense appeal. Here’s a singular vision from one of TV’s most unique creators, and he doesn’t have to fret about having to craft a season of storytelling. He just has to concern himself with 100 minutes of hopeful entertainment. Dust Bunny has a crackerjack premise, a great leading man, and some stylish flourishes and fun, and yet I walked away, after eight years removed from seeing a Fuller project, not feeling particularly swept away.
A ittle girl, Aurora (Sophie Sloan), hires a hitman (Mads Mikkelsen) to kill the monster hiding under her bed. Boom. Sold. Naturally, the jaded hitman who’s seen it all doesn’t believe the little girl. Now not only will he have to defend the little girl from a potential monster, he’ll have to fend off other hired guns and assassins trying to take out this kid because she “knows too much.”
Given that hook, I thought that Dust Bunny was going to be a monster movie by way of a hitman movie, but really it’s much more of a glib and exhausting hitman movie with the idea of a monster until the final fifteen minutes of chaotic culmination. I thought there was going to be a much more compelling and charming relationship between the two characters, possibly forming a surrogate father/daughter relationship as they descend into a realm of danger even an experienced man of action is ill-equipped for. I thought Dust Bunny was going to be more of a Guilermo del Toro-style fantasia and instead it’s far more akin to those Tarantino ripoffs with a stilted attitude in place of stakes and originality. This is much more akin to flimsy style-over-substance dross like Gunpowder Milkshake or Polar (also starring Mikkelsen) than del Toro. This is far more of a hitman movie that occasionally remembers, oh yeah, there’s this whole fantasy/horror element that could make it stand out. There’s so much about our lead hitman having to worry about this little girl because she saw his face and can identify him. There are teams of other hitmen that want to bump her off, sent by his own handler, Laverne (Sigourney Weaver). As a hitman movie, it’s pretty dull because our hero is overpowered and under matched. At no point will you worry for his own sake, and plus, just sending disposable humans into the same apartment night after night is boring. I’ve seen those kinds of movies before, even the ones that are just self-infatuated style orgies of violence. What makes this movie unique is the freaking monster, and it doesn’t really take hold until the very end of the movie, not coincidentally the best part. At that point, Dust Bunny becomes a whimsical variation on Tremors, where the unwitting participants cannot touch the floor, lest they be eaten by a monster under the floorboards. It’s a lot harder to have your shootouts and fights while balancing on scarce end tables (what if the fantasy monster could really transform the floor into lava? Oh, the nasty possibilities).
If Dust Bunny was just an exercise in vacuous style, I might find some fleeting pleasures from it, but the whimsical tone takes the premise of an unorthodox fable and mutates it under insufferable irony. It’s the kind of movie that knows you’ve seen glib hitman movies before, and it’s playing into those expectations with an attempted ironic distance but instead it just comes across as annoyingly circuitous conversations. The pained banter became baffling as characters attempted to take what the previous character said and nothing while just pushing the conversation forward a millimeter. These are not funny exchanges. These are not examples of cutesy dialogue. It’s just maddening nonsense that runs in circles, and I found myself mentally tuning out whenever it kept repeating. For me, the dialogue was too irreverent for its own good.
There’s a really engaging and imaginative movie on the outskirts trying to push on through. Having a little girl with a monster following her begs for further world-building and examination, let alone integrating the monster’s unique abilities and dangers. As it stands, all one has to do is stay off the floor during nightfall (a reintroduction of bedpans is an unfortunate must). Early on, it feels like the little girl is in real danger, as the monster literally lifts her bed off the floor and seems to try and shake her loose. Although throughout the daytime she still canoes around her lonely apartment on a giant hippo on wheels. I guess it’s a precaution or maybe she just wants to get better at apartment canoeing before nighttime when she really needs to make sure she can paddle. This is the last time you’ll feel she’s in actual danger. I wanted far less of the overtly stylish hitman antics and more of the perspective of a hitman thrust into a fantasy. Dust Bunny is a disappointing inverse, turned inside out, with a hitman movie with a different Big Bad. I’m not saying Fuller had to rely on staid fantasy storylines, like the girl is really some long-lost royalty to a hidden realm, never knowing her true identity and inheritance, and under attack from otherworldly forces wanting to usurp her throne. I mean I probably would have enjoyed that more, pushing our flinty hitman into entertaining fish-out-of-water fantasia rather than more hitman shootouts on repeat.
Dust Bunny was a frustrating experience for me from a creator that I frankly expected more from. Fuller’s always had a penchant for twee whimsy, genre blending, dark humor and the macabre, but I didn’t find his film debut nearly as cute and quirky as his television output. I found much of the tone grating and overly stylized, and while I’m sure the mannered directing is meant to better convey a fable, I impatiently grew tired of the minimalist sets, the repetitive deadpan dialogue, and the surprising lack of imagination. I wish the last act had been the whole movie. I can see fans of more malevolent 1980s children’s movies finding something to enjoy here, and over decades Fuller has certainly established enough of a fanbase to declare any entity a possible burgeoning cult movie. There are moments that made me reminisce about Jean-Pierre Jenuet (Amelie, City of Lost Children), but then I wondered what he would have done with this same premise and the comparison wasn’t so favorable any longer. I’m coming across too harsh because I wanted Dust Bunny to be much more given its premise and creative voice. There’s enough here that will qualify as passing entertainment for most viewers, especially for fans of twisted fairy tales. There’s just not enough here in execution to make me as eager for Fuller’s next feature film.
Nate’s Grade: C
Melania (2026)
Let’s tackle the reality that reviewing a documentary like Melania is practically beyond the point. This movie wasn’t created by artists who felt they had a compelling and insightful story to tell, a revelatory depiction of the human condition that would cause us all to sit back and reflect on ourselves. No, this movie was created to appease and suck up to one important orange-hued ticket-buyer. Amazon bought the rights to the movie for a staggering $40 million dollars, pledged an additional $35 million in marketing, and put out all the stops to open the documentary on the residing First Lady in 1700 screens nationwide. For those not in the know, documentaries are not big moneymakers; the highest-grossing doc of 2025 was Becoming Led Zeppelin at $16 million. Only thirteen documentaries have ever grossed over $70 million worldwide and only 39 have grossed more than $30 million. It’s hard to fathom that Amazon imagined this would become a runaway hit. They’re not that deluded. Think less of Melania as a documentary and more as a transparent corporate bribe by Amazon and its CEO, Jeff Bezos, who sure would like favorable consideration from the current administration that interferes in every facet of media to better protect the ego of a soon-to-be octogenarian who needs everyone to constantly be showering him with effusive adoration (le sigh). Welcome to our new American ecosystem, where all corporations are expected to bend the knee in fealty so as to procure favorable dispensation from a mad king always in need.
What is even the point of reviewing something like this? It’s so obviously manufactured in bad faith. Well, dear reader, I guess it comes back to my own martyr complex: I suffer so that you may be spared the same fate. Unless you’re a diehard MAGA member, Melania will be a torturously facile example of unserious people elevating other unserious people for an audience of the unserious to be patronizingly pat on the head and told that, yes, theirs is the true voice of America’s solemn destiny.
The film follows the 20 days before the second inauguration of Donald Trump as the American president. For those of you, especially in endangered minority communities, wondering what Melania Trump was going through when it came to designing the drapes and White House color patterns, fear not! Most of the movie is listening to Melania’s strained narration while we watch handlers and assistants flit about and primp the soon-to-be First Lady while handing her samples. Never has insider access felt so tedious!
Did I mention that this movie is directed by none other than Brett Ratner, disgraced filmmaker who was jettisoned from Hollywood as a Me Too reckoning following decades of harassment? Ratner has never directed a documentary before and it shows. Opening the doc with the Scorsese-esque notes from the Rolling Stones’ “Gimme Shelter” feels like sacrilege. It’s even worse when played over the start of Melania strutting through her Mar-a-Lago mansion to a fleet of cars. It plays like self-parody but you know nobody has the awareness for that. Ratner asks her such incisive questions like, “What is your favorite recording artist?” like it’s a Tiger Beat interview. Late in the film, he’s heard on camera wishing the president “sweet dreams” in the most sycophantic voice. Really Ratner’s here like everyone else, seeing the craven opportunity to get into the good graces of the president. Ratner has been pushing to get Rush Hour 4 greenlit, a sequel that I don’t even think Chris Tucker (current age: 54) and Jackie Chan (current age: 72) are eager to launch. Not that it matters to Ratner, but it’s been almost TWENTY YEARS since 2007’s Rush Hour 3, which also featured a cameo by notorious sex pest Roman Polanski. Sure enough, in the wake of Melania’s release, Trump was pushing for a Rush Hour 4, as clearly the man whose brain is always stuck in the 1980s has his finger on the pulse of the cultural zeitgeist. All Ratner had to do was make a 100-minute fluff piece about the president’s third wife and, voila, one sexual predator in the highest office in the land can ensure that another sexual predator can get his dream project, which I repeat is depressingly Rush Hour 4, off the ground. Also recall that Ratner was literally seen canoodling on a couch with pal Jeffrey Epstein and a group of young women who were certainly there by choice. Ugh.
I actually think a figure like Melania could be an interesting subject for a hard-hitting documentary. The Slovenian model becomes the third wife to a notorious philanderer and crook, enough that he was famously having sex with adult film actress Stormy Daniels while Melania was recovering from the birth of their son. From the outside, this relationship appears entirely transactional, with Trump getting a new, younger, more desirable wife, though not desirable enough to stop having affairs with other women (note: this is a condemnation of Trump, not on any perceived shortcoming of Melania). For her, she gets the security of a man of riches and with that security is the tacit understanding that he can do whatever he wants and she will have to accept it. Getting an insider’s account of all the debauchery and debasement of being Trump’s current wife could be extremely insightful and would make Melania genuinely empathetic for one of the rare times in public life. Granted, she’s made her calculation and stood silent while her husband’s regime has terrorized millions at home and endangered the lives of millions abroad, so let’s cap that degree of empathy. Still, she has a perspective that could be very illuminating under the right circumstances. It’s just that we’ll never see that kind of perspective. It’s too off-brand. It goes against her agreement with the money-man. I don’t fault her for wanting to stay in her echelon of riches and comfort any more than I would, say, a duchess who prefers a pampered life to starving on the streets. I get it, but it doesn’t excuse the lasting damage of being the pursed-lip silent partner to a degenerate with total power. Imagine a documentary about Eva Braun but it’s all about her favorite throw pillows. Not exactly the most interesting angle to take for someone so close to such disruptive and systemic abuses of power.
I take particular umbrage with one angle the documentary takes, setting Melania up as a celebration of immigration, a reflection of the American Dream. It’s more than a little hypocritical for this movie to elevate the immigrant story of Melania while the administration of her husband is targeting anyone it deems insufficiently American, namely people of color regardless of their actual citizenship. When the government’s special masked police are rounding up indigenous people to deport to adhere to an unrealistic and damningly racist daily quota, you know they’re not targeting the “worst of the worst.” Are the “worst of the worse” the day care workers? The family-owned pizzeria? The spouses of American soldiers? Those seeking asylum from persecution and death from hostile governments? The immigrants who have navigated the byzantine system of immigration to become official citizens and who are abducted by ICE for appearing at their court appointments? To manufacture Melania as a symbol of the celebration of an immigrant’s journey is farcical when the Trump Administration is built upon the elimination of immigrants from every facet of society. It isn’t a coincidence that the administration has lowered immigration numbers to a paltry 7500 in 2025 and most of those are white South Africans. She’s quoted as saying, “No matter where we come from, we are bound by the same humanity.” Uh huh. Tell that to Stephen Miller and his dogged desire to Make America as Alabaster as Possible Again.
There’s just not enough material here to cover a feature film, which is why the shallow movie often feels like an overly padded infomercial propping up its star. There are long stretches where you’re just watching people walk or listen to performances. It’s filling time. The whole enterprise feels like you’re watching someone else’s lackadaisical wedding video. There are perhaps two or three memorable moments caught on camera. The first is Trump complaining that the college football championship game being held the same day as his presidential inauguration is a conspiracy against him. His reasoning is that they’ve had the inaugural date for “centuries.” The next is Melania turning the funeral of President Jimmy Carter into her own grief about losing her mother. Melania takes reverence walking through the halls of the Capitol, remarking about the military defending the rights of the Constitution, which is quite ironic considering Donald Trump fomented an insurrection that gleefully attacked police officers to try and overturn an election in defiance of the Constitution. There’s also the line from his inaugural speech that is particularly galling in 2026: “My proudest legacy will be that of a peace-maker and unifier.” Yes, surely history will remember Trump as an instrument of peace when he’s not bombing girls’ schools and pledging to annihilate civilizations as well as other blatant war crimes.
Rather than continue to tell you about the many creative and moral shortcomings of this enterprise, why not provide a sampling of some of the best critical hits on this movie? Here you go:
“I’m not even sure it qualifies as a documentary, exactly, so much as an elaborate piece of designer taxidermy, horribly overpriced and ice-cold to the touch and proffered like a medieval tribute to placate the greedy king on his throne.” – Xan Brooks, The Guardian
“To say that Melania is a hagiography would be an insult to hagiographies.” – Frank Scheck, The Hollywood Reporter
“Melania the movie isn’t a documentary; it’s a protection racket.” -Sophie Gilbert, The Atlantic
“A soothingly looped AI screensaver.” -Amy Noicholson, Los Angeles Times
“Call it a document, instead, of 20 days in the First Lady’s life circa January 2025, with all the weight and depth of a Post-it.” -Liz Shannon Miller, Consequence
“Ratner’s film plays like a gilded trash remake of Jonathan Glazer’s The Zone of Interest in which a button-eyed Cinderella points at gold baubles and designer dresses, cunningly distracting us while her husband and his cronies prepare to dismantle the Constitution and asset-strip the federal government.” -Xan Brooks cooking again, The Guardian
Anyway, don’t watch Melania. I was never going to appreciate this movie. It was not made for me. It wasn’t made for you either. It wasn’t made for anyone but the First Lady, who had editorial control over the movie, so why would you expect anything other than a stage-managed image-consulted propaganda puff piece on her air of dignified grace and style? Hearing her somnambulant narration over her gilded life and the pageantry of a second inauguration of the most destructive president in American history, it’s enough to make you zone out. While wars are being waged, prices are soaring, neighbors are being rounded up into camps of concentration by masked goons, and corruption and graft reign supreme in a government run by the worst people imaginable, it’s hard not to find a soft-pedaled vanity project like Melania as an offense to the senses. If there are bigger wastes of time at the movies in 2026, it will be a truly hellacious year. This is not being best. This is not being best at all.
Nate’s Grade: F








You must be logged in to post a comment.