The Fountain (2006)
After six years of anticipation, I cannot escape my crushing disappointment with writer/director Darren Aronofsky’s long-awaited follow-up to one of my favorite films, Requiem for a Dream. While the film manages to be visually resplendent, there is no emotional involvement at all because of how abbreviated the story is. This thing barely covers 90 scant minutes and, this may be the first time I’ve ever said this, but The Fountain needed to be an hour longer, minimum. The separate time frames bleed into each other and there’s a lot of repetition, but then we discover that the cutaways to the 16th century and the visions of the LSD-heavy future are simply side trips detailed in a book. The real meat of the story is on one man losing the love of his life to illness and how they come to grips with eventual loss; however, I can’t feel as much empathy when the movie fails to take any time to set up characters. Aronofsky keeps things interesting, and rather weird, but this romantic fable ends up being nothing more than a misguided folly thanks to a total lack of breathing room for the characters to live. This was probably my single biggest disappointment of all the 2006 movies.
Nate’s Grade: C
Share this:
Posted on October 14, 2007, in 2006 Movies and tagged cancer, darren aronofsky, doomed romance, drama, ellen burstyn, hugh jackman, period film, rachel weisz, sci-fi. Bookmark the permalink. 1 Comment.
nathanzoebl 
I have the film on DVD, and have watched it several times. I happen to like this film very much. It does require some analysis to fully comprehend (as is the case with a few other films, e.g., “Mulholland Drive”), but that’s what makes it interesting. I also very much like “Requiem for a Dream,” which is simply plotted but very engaging.